Building an Exit Strategy Before You Need One

Every business owner will eventually leave their company. However, many owners spend years building businesses without developing a clear business exit strategy. An exit may result from a planned sale, family succession, management buyout, or transfer to another owner. Conversely, unexpected circumstances or events, including death, divorce, disability, or disagreement (the “4 D’s”) may force an owner to exit earlier than anticipated. For many owners, a significant portion of their personal wealth remains concentrated within the business. Therefore, the eventual transfer may represent the largest financial transaction of their lifetime.

A business exit strategy connects the owner’s personal, financial, and professional objectives with the future direction of the company. It also provides a framework for making decisions long before a transaction becomes necessary. Business owners should begin by defining what a successful exit looks like. That definition extends beyond achieving the highest possible purchase price. For instance, some owners want complete liquidity and an immediate departure following closing. Others prioritize employee continuity, family legacy, retained ownership, or continued involvement with the company.

Once those objectives become clear, owners may evaluate whether the business currently supports their desired outcome. A preliminary business valuation may establish a starting point and identify potential gaps between value and financial objectives. Likewise, an Exit Readiness Assessment may identify risks that may reduce value or limit future transaction alternatives. These risks may involve management, customer concentration, financial reporting, operations, legal matters, or owner dependence. Owners may then develop a tactical plan for strengthening the business before an exit. Several years of preparation may provide meaningful time to address weaknesses and improve important value drivers.

During this period, owners may strengthen management, diversify customers, improve margins, and formalize operating systems. They may also improve financial reporting, resolve legal issues, and reduce dependence on individual employees or customers. Notably, these improvements benefit the company even when an owner postpones the sale. A stronger business may produce better earnings, reduce risk, and provide greater flexibility under changing circumstances.

An experienced M&A advisor will help develop a business exit strategy well before the company enters the market. The advisor may establish value, assess readiness, identify improvements, and evaluate potential exit alternatives. Exit planning does not require an owner to decide today when the business will be sold. Instead, it creates options and prepares the owner to act when personal circumstances and market conditions align. Emergency exits will always exist. A well-developed exit strategy helps ensure that an owner’s eventual departure does not become one.

Growing Your Business Through Strategic Acquisitions

Organic growth remains an effective way to build a company, but it may require significant time and investment. Growth through acquisition may provide another path for companies seeking to accelerate their strategic plans. Acquisitions allow companies to obtain capabilities that might take years to develop internally. They may also provide immediate access to established customers, employees, products, technologies, and geographic markets.

Accordingly, companies pursuing aggressive growth should consider acquisitions when they support clearly defined strategic objectives. Common acquisition motivations include:

  • Capturing operational or financial synergies
  • Increasing market share
  • Entering new geographic markets
  • Expanding distribution channels
  • Adding complementary products or services
  • Acquiring new technologies or capabilities
  • Recruiting specialized talent
  • Strengthening customer relationships

Still, an acquisition should accomplish more than simply increasing revenue. The right target should strengthen the buyer’s competitive position and support its broader business strategy. For example, a target may provide greater scale, improved purchasing power, or additional production capacity. Another acquisition may provide capabilities that complement the buyer’s existing operations. Similarly, acquisitions may help companies broaden product offerings or move into attractive adjacent markets. Buyers may also acquire businesses that improve their position within an industry’s value chain.

Successful growth through acquisition requires discipline before a potential target becomes available. Management should first determine which capabilities, markets, or resources the company needs to achieve its objectives. From there, management may establish acquisition criteria covering industry, geography, size, profitability, customers, capabilities, and valuation. These criteria create a framework for evaluating opportunities consistently.

Acquisition opportunities do not always appear when companies expect them. For that reason, buyers should continuously identify and develop relationships with potential acquisition targets. Meanwhile, management must evaluate whether the company has sufficient financial and operational resources to complete an acquisition. Financing availability, management capacity, integration requirements, and organizational readiness all affect transaction feasibility. Timing also matters. Attractive targets may become available because of retirement, succession issues, shareholder disagreements, or changing strategic priorities. On the other side, business owners cannot always control when prospective buyers enter the market. A strategic buyer may approach when the company’s capabilities satisfy an immediate acquisition need.

An experienced M&A advisor will help companies develop an acquisition criteria and identify qualified targets. The advisor may also evaluate value, structure transactions, negotiate terms, and coordinate due diligence. Growth through acquisition works best when opportunity meets a clearly defined strategic need. A disciplined acquisition strategy helps companies recognize those opportunities and act when the right target becomes available.

Timing the Market When Selling a Business

Business owners cannot predict the perfect time to sell their companies. However, timing the sale of your business may significantly influence value and transaction terms. An attractive selling opportunity occurs when strong company performance aligns with favorable market conditions. Therefore, business owners should understand both their businesses and the M&A environment surrounding them.

Certain market conditions may create periods of unusually strong buyer demand. Industry consolidation, available capital, favorable financing, and strategic expansion may increase acquisition activity. For example, strategic buyers may pursue acquisitions to enter new markets, expand capabilities, or increase market share. Private equity groups may simultaneously seek platform companies and complementary add-on acquisitions.

When several buyers pursue similar businesses, competition may increase. As buyer interest strengthens, sellers may receive higher valuations, better terms, or greater flexibility in transaction structure. Several market signals may indicate a favorable opportunity:

  • Increasing acquisition activity within the industry
  • Multiple buyers pursuing similar companies
  • Rising valuations for comparable transactions
  • Private equity investment entering the sector
  • Strategic buyers completing industry roll-ups
  • Favorable acquisition financing
  • Competitors receiving unsolicited acquisition offers

Yet, favorable markets do not remain favorable indefinitely. Buyers eventually satisfy acquisition objectives, deploy available capital, or redirect their attention toward other industries. Market conditions may also change unexpectedly. Higher interest rates, economic uncertainty, regulatory changes, or industry disruption may quickly reduce acquisition activity.

For this reason, business owners should recognize that an attractive selling window may not coincide with their planned retirement date. A compelling opportunity may arise years before an owner expects to exit. In those situations, age alone should not determine whether an owner explores a transaction. A younger owner may receive an exceptional offer during a period of unusually strong buyer demand.

Exploring that opportunity does not require the owner to sell. Instead, the owner may evaluate whether current market conditions justify changing the existing exit timeline. At the same time, strong market conditions cannot compensate for a poorly prepared business. Buyers still evaluate profitability, growth, management, customer concentration, financial reporting, and other risks. Accordingly, business owners should maintain their businesses in a condition that allows them to respond when attractive opportunities emerge. Regular valuation work may also provide perspective on changing company and market values.

An experienced M&A advisor will provide additional insight into buyer activity, transaction multiples, financing conditions, and industry consolidation. That perspective will help business owners distinguish an exceptional market from normal acquisition activity. Successfully timing the sale of your business does not require predicting the future. Instead, it requires preparation, market awareness, and the ability to recognize an exceptional opportunity when it appears.

The Strategic Exit

If you are considering selling your business, strategic buyers should rank at the top of your prospective buyer list. These buyers often pay premium valuations because they acquire businesses for strategic, rather than purely financial, reasons.

Strategic buyers operate in the same industry or serve related markets. They may include competitors, suppliers, customers, or companies offering complementary products or services. Their primary objective is to acquire businesses that strengthen existing operations and create long-term shareholder value. Consequently, they often evaluate acquisition opportunities differently than financial buyers.

Strategic buyers pursue acquisitions for many reasons. They may seek economies of scale, expanded product offerings, new geographic markets, additional distribution channels, or enhanced operating capabilities. In many cases, a single acquisition may accomplish several strategic objectives simultaneously.

As a result, strategic buyers frequently become some of the most qualified purchasers of middle market companies. More importantly, they often pay higher purchase prices than financial buyers. They recognize opportunities to create value through operational efficiencies, cost savings, revenue growth, and business integration. Those synergies increase the value of the combined organization and often justify premium valuations.

Furthermore, strategic acquisitions frequently provide a cleaner ownership transition. Many strategic buyers expect the seller to exit after a reasonable transition period. They also eliminate overlapping functions and integrate administrative, operational, and back-office activities. Because they understand the industry, they often complete due diligence more efficiently and move transactions toward closing with greater confidence.

Customers may also benefit from a strategic acquisition. Expanded product offerings, broader service capabilities, greater financial resources, and improved operational support often create a stronger organization. Consequently, employees, customers, and business partners may all benefit from the combined company’s increased capabilities.

Not every acquisition follows a traditional model. Strategic buyers sometimes pursue acquisitions primarily to accelerate revenue and earnings growth. Likewise, private equity firms frequently complete strategic add-on acquisitions through existing portfolio companies. An experienced M&A advisory team understands these different buyer motivations, identifies the most qualified acquirers, and manages a competitive sale process designed to maximize value and achieve a successful transaction.

Bridging The Valuation Gap in M&A

Economic uncertainty, capital market volatility, and tighter financing conditions have created a challenging environment for buyers and sellers in the lower middle market. These pressures have intensified focus on valuation and widened the gap between buyer and seller expectations.

Before the pandemic, valuations reached historic highs. Today, buyers apply greater scrutiny, and sellers often struggle to align expectations. As a result, both parties must use creative deal structures for bridging the valuation gap in M&A transactions.

  • Earnouts offer one effective solution. Buyers can justify higher valuations by incorporating performance-based payouts tied to future results. A well-defined earnout structure should outline clear metrics, timelines, and strategic goals. This approach aligns incentives and reduces risk for both parties.
  • Buyer’s Stock may also help in bridging the valuation gap in M&A. Buyers preserve cash by issuing equity, while sellers participate in future upside. A thoughtful structure may also create tax advantages, depending on the transaction.
  • Seller’s Notes provide another flexible tool. Buyers use seller financing to reduce upfront cash requirements or address capital constraints. Sellers benefit from interest income and may achieve favorable tax treatment. Proper structuring may also help protect the agreed purchase price.

Despite ongoing market uncertainty, knowledgeable M&A teams help clients navigate valuation challenges and structure successful transactions. The right advisory team will align expectations and deliver practical, executable solutions.

COVID-19 Pandemic: This Too Shall Pass

After two months of a global economic shutdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the outlook for lower middle market mergers and acquisitions remains uncertain. Buyers, sellers, lenders, and advisors continue assessing the long-term economic impact, making it difficult to predict when transaction activity will recover.

Many strategic buyers have adopted a wait-and-see approach to acquisitions. Rather than pursuing growth opportunities, they are preserving liquidity, stabilizing operations, and protecting their core businesses. Financial buyers, including private equity firms, have also shifted their attention inward. They are supporting existing portfolio companies, strengthening balance sheets, and ensuring those businesses have sufficient capital to weather the economic disruption.

Potential sellers should not despair. According to PwC’s report, Succeeding through M&A in Uncertain Economic Times, U.S. public companies now hold more than four times as much cash as they did a quarter-century ago. Additionally, private equity firms control record levels of undeployed capital, commonly referred to as “dry powder.” Although many investors have temporarily paused acquisitions, they must eventually deploy that capital when market conditions stabilize and confidence returns.

Business owners contemplating a liquidity event should begin planning now instead of waiting for conditions to improve. Early preparation allows owners to strengthen financial reporting, improve operations, and identify opportunities to maximize value before entering the market. Additionally, they should consult with an experienced M&A advisory team to develop a thoughtful exit strategy and prepare for buyer scrutiny.

A decline in financial performance resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic is both expected and understandable. Buyers will recognize these temporary disruptions, but they will closely evaluate how your company and management team respond to adversity. Companies that preserve customer relationships, control costs, adapt operations, and maintain profitability will stand out in the marketplace. Those actions will strengthen buyer confidence and help maximize value when M&A activity resumes.

COVID-19’s Impact on M&A

Many merger and acquisition processes are on hold while buyers and sellers seek greater clarity on COVID-19’s health and economic effects. COVID-19’s impact on M&A continues to reshape transaction planning, buyer expectations, and deal execution. Although transaction activity has slowed, companies continue preparing for future opportunities as markets adjust to rapidly changing conditions.

Business owners considering a sale should expect the pandemic to influence nearly every stage of the acquisition process. Buyers, lenders, and advisors are reassessing risk, valuation, and transaction structures. As a result, successful transactions will require greater planning, flexibility, and collaboration than before.

Several areas now deserve increased attention.

Preparing for Sale. Business owners should determine whether now is the right time to pursue a transaction. They should also evaluate current valuations and consider whether buyers will recognize the company’s long-term value despite recent disruptions.

Timing. Transactions will likely require additional time to complete. Travel restrictions, remote work, lender requirements, and extended due diligence may delay the closing process.

Due Diligence. Buyers will conduct more extensive due diligence across financial, legal, operational, and commercial matters. They will closely examine force majeure provisions, supply chain risks, emergency preparedness, employee matters, and insurance coverage.

Acquisition Agreements. Buyers and sellers should expect increased negotiation over risk allocation. Acquisition agreements may include expanded representations and warranties, interim operating covenants, earn-outs, additional closing conditions, termination rights, and special indemnification provisions addressing COVID-19-related findings.

Financing. Buyers should confirm that attractive long-term financing remains available before committing to a transaction. Lenders may impose additional underwriting requirements or modify financing terms as market conditions evolve.

Business owners should work closely with experienced M&A advisors throughout this period. Professional guidance can help navigate market volatility, manage transaction risk, and position a company for a successful sale when conditions improve.

The Doomsday Ratio

Is your company prepared to survive a doomsday scenario? Economic uncertainty can emerge quickly and challenge even well-managed businesses. Without meaningful financial measurements, business owners may struggle to understand how their companies are truly performing.

Financial ratios provide objective benchmarks for evaluating a company’s financial health. They convert information from the income statement and balance sheet into standardized measurements. Owners can compare those measurements over time, against competitors, or across the broader industry. These comparisons often reveal strengths, weaknesses, and trends that traditional financial statements may not immediately identify.

Liquidity ratios deserve special attention during periods of economic uncertainty. These ratios measure a company’s ability to satisfy short-term obligations without raising additional capital. Strong liquidity provides flexibility, supports daily operations, and helps businesses withstand unexpected disruptions.

Common liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, days sales outstanding, and the Doomsday Ratio. Each ratio measures liquidity from a different perspective and provides valuable insight into financial stability.

The Doomsday Ratio offers the most conservative measure of liquidity. It assumes the worst possible operating environment and ignores every current asset except cash and cash equivalents. The ratio is calculated by dividing cash and cash equivalents by current liabilities. The result indicates whether available cash can satisfy short-term obligations without relying on receivables, inventory, or external financing.

The Doomsday Ratio becomes even more valuable when tracked over time. A declining ratio may signal increasing financial pressure before more serious problems develop. An improving ratio may indicate stronger cash management and greater financial resilience.

No single financial ratio tells the entire story. Business owners should evaluate multiple ratios together and consider industry benchmarks when assessing financial performance. An experienced M&A advisory team can help interpret these measurements, identify potential risks, and recommend strategies that strengthen financial performance before a crisis occurs.

Beyond EBITDA: The Importance of the Balance Sheet

Business owners often focus on the purchase price and overlook the importance of the balance sheet when selling a company. However, purchase price tells only part of the story. Working capital may significantly increase or decrease the seller’s proceeds at closing. Therefore, buyers and sellers should address working capital early in the transaction process.

Most merger and acquisition transactions determine value using a company’s earnings, cash flow, and future growth prospects, while applying a discount for risk. However, buyers also evaluate the balance sheet to understand the company’s financial position. Consequently, negotiating balance sheet target values should become an important part of every middle market transaction.

Working capital generally equals current assets less current liabilities. In an acquisition, however, transactional working capital represents the normal operating capital required to run the business after closing. Buyers expect to receive a business with sufficient working capital to continue normal operations. Accordingly, the purchase agreement usually includes a target working capital amount.

Transactional working capital typically excludes cash, cash equivalents, and interest-bearing debt. Instead, the calculation focuses on operating assets and operating liabilities. Common components include accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. Every transaction requires careful analysis because each business operates differently.

Determining an adequate working capital target requires both financial analysis and sound judgment. There is no universal formula that applies to every business or industry. Instead, buyers and sellers typically analyze historical monthly balances to establish a normalized working capital target. Even then, the parties often reach different conclusions.

Not surprisingly, buyers usually seek a higher working capital target. Conversely, sellers often prefer a lower target to maximize cash proceeds at closing. These competing objectives frequently make working capital one of the most negotiated provisions in the purchase agreement.

An experienced M&A advisory team may help bridge those differences. Advisors understand market practices, identify unusual balance sheet items, and negotiate adjustments that protect their clients’ interests. Moreover, thoughtful working capital negotiations may increase a seller’s proceeds by five to fifteen percent of the total purchase price. For many business owners, that improvement represents one of the most valuable outcomes of a well-managed transaction.

The Value of Confidentiality

Confidentiality forms the foundation of every successful merger and acquisition transaction. Without it, buyers and sellers expose themselves to unnecessary business, financial, and competitive risks. Consequently, protecting confidential information should remain a top priority throughout every stage of the transaction process.

Confidentiality becomes especially important when protecting employees, customers, vendors, competitors, and the public. It also plays a critical role when a transaction involves publicly traded companies and the potential misuse of material nonpublic information. Therefore, every participant should understand the importance of safeguarding sensitive information from the beginning of the process.

Middle market business owners often take different approaches to employee communication. Some owners disclose very little information before closing and confide only in trusted advisors. Others carefully manage the timing and content of communications to reduce uncertainty and maintain employee confidence. Regardless of the approach, owners should control the message and communicate strategically.

Premature disclosure may create significant challenges. Employees may become distracted or seek other employment. Customers and suppliers may question the company’s long-term stability. Competitors may also exploit uncertainty to pursue valuable employees, customers, or business opportunities. As a result, maintaining confidentiality protects both enterprise value and business continuity.

A comprehensive nondisclosure or confidentiality agreement provides an essential layer of protection. The agreement should prohibit unauthorized disclosure of the seller’s identity, financial information, operating results, customer relationships, and strategic plans. It should also protect the proprietary knowledge, processes, and competitive advantages that distinguish the business from its competitors.

However, a confidentiality agreement alone cannot guarantee discretion. Buyers, sellers, advisors, lenders, and other participants must consistently follow established confidentiality procedures throughout the transaction. Accordingly, experienced M&A advisors carefully manage the flow of information and limit access to those with a legitimate business need.

Although many parties view confidentiality agreements as routine documents, they represent much more than a transaction formality. Strong confidentiality practices preserve business value, protect stakeholder relationships, and increase the likelihood of a successful closing.