“Prepare My Business for Sale”: How Owners Build Value Before an Exit

/in /by

As M&A advisors, one of the most common questions we hear from business owners is deceptively simple: How do I prepare my business for sale? The question usually comes with urgency, but effective preparation is rarely urgent work. In fact, the most successful exits are the result of deliberate decisions made well before a transaction is on the horizon.

At its core, preparing a business for sale means understanding one fundamental truth: the value of your company is in the eyes of the buyer. Buyers do not pay for effort or personal sacrifice. They pay for future, transferable cash flow, and they discount that cash flow when risk is unclear or poorly managed.

For most family-owned companies, meaningful preparation should begin at least 18 to 24 months before going to market. This timeline allows owners to improve performance, correct structural weaknesses, and demonstrate consistency. Waiting until a deal is imminent usually results in missed opportunities and avoidable valuation discounts.

Below are the primary areas buyers consistently evaluate when determining value. Rather than viewing them as rigid categories, think of them as interconnected pillars that collectively shape a buyer’s perception of quality, risk, and upside.

Financial Transparency and Earnings Quality

Financial transparency is one of the most important factors buyers evaluate. Buyers place the highest value on companies with GAAP-compliant financial statements prepared by an independent CPA, because those statements establish credibility and reduce underwriting risk.

The level of trust a buyer places on financials depends heavily on the level of CPA involvement. Audited financial statements provide the highest level of assurance and are viewed as the gold standard, particularly for larger or more complex businesses. Reviewed financials offer a meaningful level of comfort through analytical procedures and inquiries, while compiled financials provide basic organization of results but limited assurance. Buyers will price risk accordingly when audited or reviewed statements are not available.

Regardless of the level of review, financial statements must be clean, consistent, and defensible. This includes cleaning up the balance sheet by removing excess cash and non-operating assets, writing off uncollectible receivables and obsolete inventory, eliminating shareholder or employee loans, and properly recording all liabilities such as accrued vacation, bonuses, and employee benefits.

Equally important is normalizing earnings. Owner compensation, personal expenses, and non-recurring or one-time items should be clearly identified and adjusted to reflect true operating performance. Credible financials build trust, accelerate diligence, reduce valuation disputes, and materially strengthen a seller’s negotiating leverage.

Management Depth and Owner Independence

Another significant valuation factor in the middle market is the extent to which a business depends on its owner. Companies that require the owner’s constant involvement to function are inherently riskier to buyers.

Preparing for a sale often means shifting from a founder-centric model to a management-driven one. Buyers look for capable leaders in key functions, clear decision-making authority, and accountability that extends beyond the owner. When leadership depth exists, buyers gain confidence that the business will continue to perform after the transition.

Retention is equally important. Incentive compensation, long-term rewards, and change-of-control arrangements for key managers help ensure continuity and preserve value through and beyond the transaction.

Revenue Quality and Customer Relationships

Not all revenue is valued equally. Buyers favor companies with predictable, diversified, and repeatable revenue streams.

Customer concentration is a common concern. When a small number of customers represent a large percentage of revenue, buyers perceive heightened risk. Sellers should work to diversify relationships where possible and formalize key accounts through contracts or long-standing agreements.

Equally important is how sales are generated. Businesses that rely heavily on the owner’s personal relationships or intuition-driven selling are less attractive than those with documented processes, pipelines, and measurable performance metrics. Predictability almost always outweighs short-term spikes in revenue.

Operational Discipline and Scalability

Operational strength reflects how well a business converts strategy into execution.

Companies that have documented processes, reliable systems, and consistent performance are easier to underwrite and easier to scale. Buyers look for operational clarity: how work gets done, how quality is maintained, and how issues are resolved.

Physical assets and facilities matter as well. Equipment should be maintained, suppliers diversified, and leases structured in ways that do not restrict future flexibility. Operational improvements often enhance both profitability and buyer confidence at the same time.

Strategic Direction and Forward Visibility

Buyers are not acquiring your past performance. They are acquiring your future potential. Companies that can clearly articulate where they are going, and why they are positioned to succeed, consistently command stronger valuations.

This does not require a glossy business plan, but it does require thoughtful preparation. Buyers want to see that management understands what drives growth, where opportunities exist, and what resources are required to capture them. Clear strategic priorities, supported by realistic assumptions, signal discipline and credibility.

Financial projections play an important role here. Strong projections are grounded in historical results and explain how growth will occur. When sellers cannot articulate their future strategy, buyers are forced to make assumptions, and those assumptions are rarely generous.

Market Positioning and Demand Generation

Buyers want to understand why customers choose your company and whether that choice is sustainable.

Strong market positioning includes a clear value proposition, well-defined target customers, and evidence that demand is systematic rather than accidental. Effective marketing does not need to be flashy, but it should be intentional and measurable. Buyers look for lead generation processes, conversion metrics, and a reasonable understanding of customer acquisition costs.

When a company can demonstrate consistent demand and explain how marketing efforts translate into revenue, it reduces buyer uncertainty and supports higher valuation multiples.

Workforce Stability and Organizational Health

A company’s people are often its most valuable, and most vulnerable, asset in a transaction.

Buyers assess whether the workforce is stable, appropriately compensated, and aligned with company goals. High turnover, misaligned incentives, or cultural dysfunction increase perceived integration risk. Identifying critical employees and implementing retention strategies well ahead of a sale can materially protect value.

Clear roles, performance expectations, and communication structures also signal organizational maturity. Buyers place a premium on businesses that operate cohesively rather than relying on informal knowledge or individual heroics.

Structural and Legal Readiness

Legal and structural matters rarely create upside, but they frequently create downside. From a buyer’s perspective, unresolved legal issues represent uncertainty, and uncertainty is always priced against the seller.

Well-prepared companies ensure that their corporate structure is clean, consistent, and defensible. This includes up-to-date formation documents, clear ownership records, and properly documented governance. Buyers will also examine customer and supplier contracts for assignability, termination rights, and change-of-control provisions. Informal agreements, handshake deals, or contracts tied personally to the owner raise red flags.

Intellectual property is another common issue. Proprietary processes, trademarks, software, and trade secrets should be clearly owned by the company and not the individual owner. Addressing these matters early prevents costly delays and last-minute concessions during diligence.

Final Thoughts

Preparing a company for sale is not a cosmetic exercise. It is a process of building value by improving performance, reducing risk, and increasing transferability. Owners who approach preparation thoughtfully, and early, gain control over timing, pricing, and deal structure.

The most successful exits are achieved by sellers who think like buyers long before they meet one. When preparation is intentional and disciplined, valuation becomes an outcome, not a surprise.

Considering a Sale?

If you are thinking about selling your business in the next two to three years, now is the time to start preparing. Early planning creates optionality, strengthens negotiating leverage, and often results in meaningfully better outcomes.

As M&A advisors to middle-market business owners, we work with sellers well before a transaction to identify value drivers, address risk, and position companies for a successful exit.

If you would like a confidential conversation about how prepared your business is for a future sale, or what steps you should be taking now, feel free to reach out.

Selling Your Business? How an M&A Advisor Adds Real Value

/in /by

For most business owners, selling their business represents the largest and most consequential financial transaction of their lives. It’s the culmination of years, or even decades, of effort, sacrifice, and risk-taking. Given what’s at stake, it’s essential that the sale process is managed with precision, professionalism, and discretion.

That’s where a sell-side M&A advisor plays a critical role.

When a business owner engages an M&A advisor to lead the sale of their business, they’re not just hiring someone to find a buyer. They’re hiring a strategic advisor, negotiator, project manager, and market expert whose singular mission is to deliver the best possible outcome – maximum value, optimal terms, and minimal disruption.

Here’s a breakdown of the comprehensive services an M&A advisor provides to a business owner preparing to sell:

1.  Establishing a Realistic and Data-Driven Business Valuation

The first step in preparing a business for sale is understanding its market value. While many owners have a rough idea of what they believe their business is worth, it’s the M&A advisor’s job to validate, or reset, those expectations based on data and real market dynamics.

A proper valuation considers:

  • Historical financial performance
  • Forward-looking earnings potential
  • Industry trends and comparable transactions
  • Customer and revenue concentration
  • Profit margins, scalability, and working capital requirements
  • Company-specific strengths and risks

Beyond just providing a number, a skilled M&A advisor explains how buyers will perceive value and what adjustments (such as EBITDA normalization or working capital targets) are likely to be made. This sets a realistic foundation for negotiations and avoids costly surprises down the road.

2. Crafting the Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM)

Once the business is market-ready, the next step is building a compelling story; one that will resonate with qualified buyers. This comes in the form of a Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM), a detailed document that outlines the company’s operations, financials, market positioning, and growth prospects.

The CIM typically includes:

  • Executive summary
  • Company history and ownership structure
  • Product or service overview
  • Customer base and revenue breakdown
  • Supply chain and operations overview
  • Management team profiles
  • Financial statements and performance analysis
  • Industry trends and competitive landscape
  • Strategic growth opportunities and projections

M&A advisors specialize in presenting this information in a way that is clear, credible, and buyer-friendly. A well-written CIM doesn’t just inform, it persuades.

3.  Designing a Targeted Go-to-Market Strategy

With the CIM in hand, the M&A advisor develops a customized marketing strategy to take the company to market. The objective is to generate interest from the right buyers, not just any buyer.

This involves identifying:

  • Strategic buyers – typically competitors, suppliers, customers, or adjacent businesses that could achieve synergies post-acquisition
  • Private equity groups – financial sponsors seeking platform or add-on acquisitions
  • Family offices and independent sponsors – increasingly active players in the lower middle market
  • Search funds and individual investors – often backed by institutional capital

Each process is tailored to the seller’s objectives. For some, a broad, competitive auction may be appropriate. For others, a more limited, confidential outreach to a select group of buyers may be preferable. In either case, confidentiality is paramount, and all buyer contact is conducted under strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

4.  Managing Confidential Buyer Outreach and Qualification

Buyer outreach is conducted discreetly, often starting with a blind summary (“Teaser”) that highlights the company’s value proposition without revealing its identity. Interested buyers are vetted through a screening process before they receive the CIM.

This screening includes:

  • Verifying financial capacity to complete a transaction
  • Assessing strategic interest and cultural alignment
  • Reviewing acquisition history and credibility
  • Confirming source of funds (especially important for private buyers)

M&A advisors act as a filter, ensuring that only serious, qualified parties move forward in the process. This protects the seller’s time, reputation, and internal confidentiality.

5.  Hosting Buyer Meetings and Managing the Diligence Process

After initial expressions of interest (Indications of Interest or IOIs), the M&A advisor coordinates management presentations where buyers meet the leadership team and get a deeper understanding of the business.

At this stage, the advisor:

  • Prepares the seller for presentations and Q&A
  • Facilitates logistics and buyer communication
  • Manages expectations and timelines
  • Oversees the secure virtual data room for due diligence

This is where buyer interest becomes more tangible. M&A advisors maintain process discipline to keep multiple parties engaged, avoid deal fatigue, and build competitive tension.

6.  Negotiating Offers and Structuring the Deal

As buyers move from preliminary interest to formal offers (Letters of Intent or LOIs), the advisor takes the lead in evaluating, negotiating, and improving deal terms.

An LOI typically outlines:

  • Purchase price and structure (cash, stock, earnout, seller note, etc.)
  • Working capital targets
  • Post-close roles for the seller or management
  • Exclusivity period
  • Timeline to closing

The advisor helps the seller assess not just the headline price, but the full economic and legal picture. Is the offer fully financed? Is there a potential earnout? Are there indemnification caps? What’s the tax impact?

By managing negotiations, the advisor ensures the seller doesn’t leave money on the table or accept risky or overly complex deal structures. Competitive tension is often leveraged to improve terms, increase valuation, or accelerate timelines.

7.  Managing the Process Through to Closing

Even after an LOI is signed, there’s a long road to closing. Due diligence becomes more intense, attorneys begin drafting definitive agreements, and third-party approvals may be required.

The M&A advisor remains actively involved to:

  • Coordinate diligence checklists and timelines
  • Work alongside the seller’s legal and accounting teams
  • Resolve deal issues and manage surprises
  • Serve as a buffer between buyer and seller when needed
  • Keep all parties aligned and moving toward closing

Deals can be emotionally and logistically complex. Having a dedicated deal quarterback is invaluable to protect the seller’s interests and reduce the risk of a broken deal.

8.  Preserving Confidentiality and Business Focus

One of the most underappreciated but vital roles an M&A advisor plays is protecting confidentiality throughout the sale process. Premature leaks can create uncertainty among employees, customers, suppliers, and competitors, potentially damaging the business.

By managing communications, enforcing NDAs, and controlling access to sensitive information, the advisor allows the business to continue operating without distraction or disruption.

Just as importantly, they free up the seller to remain focused on performance. Deals can take 6–9 months (or more), and any decline in financial performance during that time can materially affect valuation or jeopardize the transaction. The advisor absorbs the burden so the business owner can continue to lead effectively.

Final Thoughts: A Partner for the Most Important Transaction of Your Life

Engaging an M&A advisor is not an expense; it’s an investment in the outcome of your life’s work. From strategic preparation to deal execution, an experienced advisor brings clarity, confidence, and results to what is often a complex and emotionally charged process.

If you’re considering selling your business in the near future, or even several years out, having an early conversation with a qualified M&A advisor can help you understand your company’s value drivers, address potential risks, and ensure you’re in the strongest position when the time is right to go to market.

After all, you only sell your business once!

Understanding EBITDA in M&A Transactions

/in /by

Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, or EBITDA, is a widely used measure of a company’s operating performance. Understanding EBITDA in M&A is particularly important because buyers and sellers frequently use it when evaluating earnings and enterprise value.

EBITDA begins with net income and adds back interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Removing interest helps buyers compare companies without considering differences in financing structures. Likewise, excluding income taxes reduces differences resulting from tax structures and other tax-related factors. Depreciation and amortization represent non-cash expenses recorded on the income statement. Therefore, adding these expenses back provides another perspective on operating profitability before certain accounting charges.

The basic formula is:

EBITDA = Net Income + Interest Expense + Income Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization

The analysis of EBITDA in M&A often extends beyond the amount reported in a company’s financial statements. M&A advisors analyze historical earnings and identify legitimate adjustments that better represent the company’s ongoing financial performance. These adjustments may include unusual, nonrecurring, or discretionary expenses that will not continue under new ownership.

For example, adjustments might address excess owner compensation, personal expenses, unusual professional fees, or one-time operating costs. However, buyers carefully scrutinize these adjustments during due diligence. Accordingly, sellers should maintain supporting documentation for every proposed adjustment.

EBITDA also plays an important role in valuation because buyers frequently apply valuation multiples to normalized EBITDA. However, EBITDA should never serve as the only measure of financial performance. It does not account for capital expenditures, working capital requirements, debt payments, or changes in cash balances. As a result, EBITDA does not equal cash flow.

Charlie Munger famously criticized EBITDA because he believed it could obscure important economic costs. His criticism highlights an important point for business owners. EBITDA provides useful information, but investors must evaluate it within the broader financial and operational context of the business.

Understanding EBITDA in M&A requires recognizing both its usefulness and limitations. Buyers and sellers should consider EBITDA alongside cash flow, growth prospects, capital requirements, working capital, and other financial considerations. An experienced M&A advisor will help analyze these factors and determine how they affect a company’s financial performance and potential value.

The Letter of Intent: A Critical Stage in an M&A Transaction

/in /by

Executing a Letter of Intent in M&A represents one of the most important milestones in the transaction process. The LOI establishes the principal business terms before the buyer begins extensive due diligence and definitive agreement negotiations.

Most provisions within an LOI remain nonbinding, with important exceptions often including confidentiality and exclusivity. However, sellers should not mistake nonbinding terms for unimportant terms. The LOI establishes expectations that often shape negotiations through closing.

Exclusivity makes this stage particularly important for sellers. After signing an LOI, sellers typically stop discussions with other prospective buyers for an agreed period. Meanwhile, the selected buyer gains access to confidential information and begins detailed due diligence. Therefore, sellers sacrifice competitive leverage when they grant exclusivity.

Before signing, sellers and their advisors should carefully evaluate three important areas:

  1. Thoroughness of business terms. The LOI should clearly address purchase price, consideration, structure, working capital, timing, and other material terms.
  2. Assessment and disclosure of risk. Sellers should identify significant issues that could affect valuation, negotiations, or closing.
  3. Accuracy of underlying information. Financial and operational information supporting the buyer’s offer should be complete, accurate, and defensible.

A seller should also evaluate contingencies, financing requirements, due diligence expectations, and the proposed exclusivity period. Addressing these matters early may reduce misunderstandings and limit unnecessary renegotiation later.

However, sometimes a buyer submits an incomplete or poorly structured LOI. The seller does not need to accept that document as the framework for negotiations. Instead, the seller and M&A advisor may prepare a reverse Letter of Intent outlining terms acceptable to the seller. A reverse LOI may clarify ambiguities, address omitted terms, and establish a stronger framework for continued negotiations. More importantly, it allows the seller to respond to comprehensively rather than negotiating numerous provisions individually.

Once both parties execute a Letter of Intent in M&A, changing fundamental business terms may become difficult. Significant changes may damage trust unless new information or circumstances justify them. Therefore, both parties should resolve major economic and structural issues before signing.

The LOI does not represent the end of negotiations. Rather, it establishes the framework for due diligence, definitive agreements, and the remaining transaction process. Experienced M&A advisors help sellers negotiate that framework carefully while preserving value, leverage, and the likelihood of a successful closing.

The Importance of Communication in M&A Transactions

/in /by

Successful lower middle market transactions require open, honest, and disciplined communication in M&A. Buyers need reliable information to understand the business, evaluate risks, and develop confidence in their investment decision. Likewise, sellers need clear communication to understand buyer expectations and navigate the transaction effectively.

Business owners usually possess the deepest knowledge of their company’s day-to-day operations. Therefore, they become an essential source of information for serious, qualified buyers. Sellers should communicate openly about operations, customers, employees, competition, market dynamics, and future growth opportunities.

Importantly, sellers should also discuss the company’s weaknesses and known risks. Attempting to hide problems may damage credibility when buyers uncover them during due diligence. Furthermore, a seller’s perceived weaknesses may represent an opportunity for a buyer with different resources, capabilities, or strategic objectives.

The guiding principle should remain simple: no surprises.

Early disclosure allows buyers and sellers to evaluate important issues before investing significant time and resources. In addition, transparency establishes credibility and strengthens trust between the parties. That trust becomes increasingly important as negotiations and due diligence intensify.

However, effective communication in M&A does not mean sellers should personally address every buyer question. Certain topics require careful coordination with the seller’s M&A advisor, attorney, CPA, and other professional advisors.

An experienced M&A advisor should manage transaction-related communications involving:

  • Purchase price, transaction structure, and consideration
  • Letters of intent and other transaction terms
  • Net working capital and purchase price adjustments
  • Due diligence requests and information flow
  • Financing requirements and closing conditions
  • Coordination with legal, accounting, and other professional advisors

This division of responsibility serves an important purpose. Sellers may focus on explaining their businesses while experienced advisors manage negotiations and transaction mechanics. Moreover, advisors may help prevent premature statements from unnecessarily weakening the seller’s negotiating position.

Communication becomes even more important when problems arise. Buyers and sellers should identify concerns quickly, provide accurate information, and work through disagreements before they threaten the transaction.

Ultimately, successful communication in M&A combines transparency with discipline. Sellers should communicate openly about their businesses while relying on their advisors to manage sensitive transaction matters. Clear communication builds trust, reduces uncertainty, and helps maintain momentum toward a successful closing.

Qualifying Buyers in an M&A Transaction

/in /by

Identifying qualified buyers in M&A requires more than finding parties interested in acquiring a business. Serious buyers must demonstrate strategic interest, financial capacity, credibility, and a willingness to complete the transaction.

Unqualified or uncertain buyers may consume considerable time and resources during a sale process. Some buyers remain curious but lack the commitment necessary to close. Others lack sufficient capital or financing to complete an acquisition. Additionally, some buyers pursue opportunities without clearly defined acquisition criteria or realistic valuation expectations.

Sellers should identify these buyers before providing extensive access to confidential information. Otherwise, management may spend valuable time answering questions and fulfilling unnecessary information requests. More importantly, an unqualified buyer may distract management and interfere with an organized sale process.

An experienced M&A advisor should qualify prospective buyers before advancing them through the process. Initially, the advisor should evaluate several important considerations:

  • What are the buyer’s acquisition criteria?
  • Why does the buyer want to acquire this particular business?
  • Does the buyer have sufficient financial resources?
  • What financing sources will support the acquisition?
  • Who must approve the transaction?
  • What is the buyer’s desired closing timeline?
  • Has the buyer identified any potential deal breakers?
  • Is the buyer evaluating other acquisition opportunities?

Financial capacity represents only one component of buyer qualification. A credible buyer should also understand the strategic rationale supporting the acquisition. Furthermore, the buyer should possess the experience, resources, and capabilities necessary to operate or oversee the business successfully.

Confidentiality also provides an important early test. Serious buyers should willingly execute a nondisclosure agreement before receiving sensitive company information. Sellers should remain cautious when prospective buyers resist reasonable confidentiality requirements or request unnecessary information prematurely.

However, sellers should not confuse thoughtful diligence with uncertainty. Qualified buyers in M&A will ask difficult questions and carefully evaluate risks before committing significant capital. The objective is not to avoid demanding buyers. Instead, sellers should distinguish disciplined buyers from those lacking commitment, resources, or a clear acquisition strategy.

Creating a competitive marketplace requires both buyer quantity and buyer quality. An experienced M&A advisor identifies, qualifies, and prioritizes credible buyers throughout the sale process. This discipline protects confidentiality, preserves management’s time, and focuses resources on buyers capable of completing a successful transaction.

Transaction Structure: Looking Beyond the Purchase Price

/in /by

Purchase price represents only one component of an offer to acquire a lower middle market business. An M&A transaction structure may significantly influence risk, proceeds, taxes, financing, and the seller’s obligations after closing.

Consequently, sellers should not automatically dismiss an offer simply because another buyer proposes a higher headline price. A properly structured lower offer may provide greater certainty, better terms, or more favorable after-tax proceeds.

The two most common acquisition structures involve purchasing assets or acquiring the seller’s equity. Each structure creates different economic, legal, accounting, and tax considerations for buyers and sellers.

In an asset sale, the buyer acquires specifically identified assets and assumes certain agreed liabilities. Buyers often prefer this structure because they may select the assets and liabilities included in the transaction. Additionally, buyers may receive favorable tax treatment from the acquired assets under applicable tax rules.

Conversely, sellers may prefer an equity transaction under certain circumstances. The buyer acquires the ownership interests of the company rather than purchasing individual assets. As a result, contracts, licenses, permits, and other relationships may remain with the existing legal entity. However, change-of-control provisions and required consents may still apply.

An M&A transaction structure also extends beyond the choice between an asset and equity sale. Buyers and sellers must evaluate several other components, including:

  • Cash paid at closing
  • Seller financing
  • Earnout payments
  • Rollover equity
  • Escrow and holdbacks
  • Working capital adjustments
  • Assumed liabilities
  • Employment or consulting arrangements

Each component affects the overall economics and risk of the transaction. For example, additional cash at closing provides greater certainty than contingent consideration. Alternatively, rollover equity may provide future upside while exposing the seller to continued investment risk.

Taxes may also materially influence transaction economics. However, the tax consequences depend on the seller’s entity structure and specific transaction terms. Therefore, sellers should involve qualified tax advisors before agreeing to a structure.

The highest purchase price does not always represent the best transaction. Sellers should compare offers based on total economic value, risk, certainty, timing, and their personal objectives.

An experienced M&A advisor may help sellers evaluate competing structures and understand their economic differences. Ultimately, the right M&A transaction structure should balance value, risk, flexibility, and the objectives of both parties.

True-Up Payments and Working Capital in M&A

/in /by

True-up payments in M&A help ensure that buyers receive the agreed level of net working capital at closing. They also protect sellers when actual working capital exceeds the negotiated target.

Most M&A transactions value a company as a going concern. Accordingly, the purchase price generally assumes the seller will deliver sufficient working capital to support normal operations. Buyers should not need to contribute additional capital immediately after closing simply because working capital was depleted before the transaction.

However, working capital changes continuously as a company operates. Accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current accounts may fluctuate significantly before closing. Therefore, buyers and sellers typically establish a targeted net working capital amount before completing the transaction.

At closing, the parties compare actual net working capital with the agreed target. If actual working capital falls below the target, the purchase price generally decreases by the shortfall. Conversely, the seller generally receives additional consideration when actual working capital exceeds the target.

For example, assume the parties establish a $1.0 million working capital target. If closing working capital equals $900,000, the purchase price could decrease by $100,000. If closing working capital equals $1.1 million, the seller could receive an additional $100,000.

Although the concept appears straightforward, the calculation may become contentious. Buyers and sellers may disagree about account classifications, accounting policies, reserves, accruals, or unusual balances. Furthermore, the parties may calculate certain accounts differently after closing.

For these reasons, sellers should address true-up payments in M&A during the Letter of Intent negotiations. The parties should clearly define working capital, the target amount, calculation methodology, and applicable accounting principles. They should also establish procedures for resolving disagreements.

Addressing these matters early provides several benefits:

  • Reduces uncertainty surrounding the final purchase price
  • Establishes consistent expectations before closing
  • Limits disagreements over accounting classifications and methodologies
  • Reduces opportunities to use working capital adjustments as a renegotiation tool
  • Provides a defined process for resolving post-closing differences

An experienced M&A advisor may help sellers understand working capital targets and evaluate proposed adjustment mechanisms. Careful negotiation before closing reduces surprises and helps preserve the economics negotiated between buyer and seller.

Rollover Equity: The Opportunity for a Second Bite

/in /by

Sellers should evaluate every component of consideration when comparing offers for their businesses. Cash, seller notes, earnouts, and rollover equity in M&A each carry different levels of risk and potential return.

Cash paid at closing provides immediate liquidity and generally offers the greatest certainty. Conversely, deferred or contingent consideration requires sellers to evaluate its present value and probability of collection. Rollover equity requires an additional consideration because its ultimate value depends on the buyer’s future success.

With rollover equity, the seller reinvests a portion of transaction proceeds into the buyer’s ownership structure. This arrangement commonly appears in private equity transactions. Rather than receiving the entire purchase price at closing, the seller maintains an ownership interest following the transaction.

For sellers, rollover equity may provide several potential advantages:

  • Continued participation in the company’s future growth
  • Additional value if the combined business appreciates
  • Alignment of interests between the seller and buyer
  • Potential participation in a future liquidity event
  • Possible tax deferral when properly structured and applicable

However, rollover equity also introduces meaningful risks. The seller exchanges immediate liquidity for an investment whose future value remains uncertain. Furthermore, the seller may hold a minority position with limited control over future decisions.

Therefore, sellers should understand exactly what they will own after closing. Important considerations include ownership percentage, voting rights, distributions, dilution protections, and future capital requirements. Sellers should also evaluate transfer restrictions, redemption rights, and the circumstances surrounding a future liquidity event.

The buyer’s capital structure deserves equal attention. Debt levels, preferred returns, management incentives, and other investor rights may affect the seller’s ultimate return. Additionally, sellers should understand whether their equity ranks equally with the buyer’s investment.

For some sellers, rollover equity in M&A creates an opportunity for what the industry calls a “second bite of the apple.” The seller realizes liquidity today while retaining exposure to future appreciation. If the business grows and later sells at a higher valuation, that retained equity could create additional proceeds.

However, potential upside should not obscure investment risk. Sellers should evaluate rollover equity as a new investment decision, separate from selling their existing business.

An experienced M&A advisor may help sellers evaluate rollover equity within the complete transaction structure. Ultimately, sellers should balance immediate liquidity, future upside, investment risk, and their personal objectives before accepting buyer equity.

Technology and AI in M&A Advisory

/in /by

Technology in M&A advisory continues to change how advisors identify buyers, analyze businesses, manage information, and execute transactions. Artificial intelligence now represents another significant advancement in that evolution.

Historically, M&A advisory has proven difficult to disrupt through technology alone. Every M&A transaction presents unique financial, operational, legal, and interpersonal considerations. Furthermore, completing a transaction requires judgment, negotiation, creativity, and extensive interaction between buyers, sellers, and their advisors. Those fundamentals have not changed. However, technology has transformed many of the tools advisors use throughout the M&A process.

Buyer identification provides a clear example. An advisor’s effectiveness once depended heavily on personal relationships and the size their Rolodex. Today, extensive databases provide access to strategic buyers, financial buyers, and well-funded individual buyers across industries and markets. Consequently, technology allows advisors to conduct broader and more targeted buyer searches. Advisors may evaluate acquisition criteria, ownership structures, transaction histories, portfolio companies, and other information before approaching prospective buyers.

Artificial intelligence expands these capabilities even further. AI assists M&A advisors with industry research, financial analysis, buyer research, document review, and the organization of large amounts of information. Additionally, AI helps identify patterns and summarize information that might otherwise require significant manual effort. However, AI does not replace the M&A advisor. Financial information requires interpretation, and every transaction involves circumstances that technology cannot fully understand. Advisors must determine which information matters and how that information affects value, risk, negotiations, and transaction structure. Likewise, sellers still rely on experienced M&A advisors to manage buyer relationships and negotiate important transaction terms. Technology cannot replace the trust required when an owner sells a business built over many years.

Ultimately, technology in M&A advisory improves the access to information and increases the efficiency of transaction execution. AI will likely accelerate these improvements as its capabilities continue to develop. Nevertheless, M&A remains a relationship-driven business. Technology provides better information, broader market access, and greater efficiency. Experienced M&A advisors must convert those advantages into informed decisions, competitive buyer interest, and disciplined transaction execution.

Allston Advisory Group is an experienced boutique M&A advisory firm providing a variety of services to lower middle market companies. See our footer for contact information.

(502) 742-2933
[email protected]
P.O. Box 21266, Louisville, KY 40221

Our Newsletter

Follow us: